Sign In To Keep Reading!
Need To Register?
Thank you for your interest in reading the fantastic content we have on CreditUnions.com! All users must log in to read, research, browse, and have fun on CreditUnions.com. It's free to create an account.
Learn What You're Missing
Upgrade Your Subscription
Back to CreditUnions.com
Read & Watch
Deposits & Payments
Operations & Technology
Search & Analyze
Find A Credit Union
Find A Credit Union Executive
Build A Peer Group
Strategy & Performance
Anatomy Of A Credit Union
Market Share Guides
Credit Union Directory
5 Tips To Survive Multiple Mergers
What Lurks In The Dark Web?
An Education In Online Banking Conversion
ACH Data Means More Lending For A NY Credi...
A Strategy To Market What Members Want
12 Ratios For Marketing Managers
It's Not Just A DC Road Race
Best Of Payments And Technology 2016
Best Of Mortgage 2016
Best Of Marketing 2016
Best Of Cooperative Strategy 2016
2017 Callahan Credit Union Directory
Which peer group services the highest number of accounts per employee?
Sophisticated Financial Tools Offer Big Advantages For Smaller Credit Unions
IRR In Today’s Cooperative Industry
Credit Union Tangibles And Intangibles
In Credit Union Litigation, Time is Money
Industry Performance By The Numbers (3Q 2015)
NCUA Uses PIMCO to Implement New Accounting Practice: Mark-to-Model
NCUA Debit Card Analysis Validates Proposed Fed Rule
The Real Problem at Arrowhead Credit Union is Working With Common Purpose, Not Lack of Capital
News Of Arrowhead Is A Timely Fourth Of July Reminder
Interview with Filson: NCUA Conservatorship & its Impact on Credit Unions
Oct. 12, 2009
I do not believe credit unions should use alternative capital to grow. At the present time a credit union cannot grow faster than retained earnings can be accumulated. This allows a profitable credit union the ability to grow. Unprofitable credit unions should not be growing. A credit union with alternative capital that fails will harm the reputation of all credit unions. The current system allows for long term sustained moderate growth. I have been in the credit union system since 1972. There has been plenty of growth in both members and assets during that time.
You are the voice of reason in these uncertin times, We really do need to get back to the fundementals of what Credit Unions are about our common bonds and Members helping Members!
Your focus on the NCUSIF is interesting. Currently, CU's have sent money to NCUSIF who earns about 2.3% on those funds in goverment securities. CUs could earn, at the margin, about 3.5% if that money was left in the natural person CU system to help members with loans.
120bps on $8.024 billion at NCUSIF is worth about $96 million more a year!
Very moving article. I recall not too long ago Mike Fryzel, when asked about using NCUSIF funds for this purpose, said definitely not and claimed the funds were exclusively for credit union member deposit insurance even though it is indeed used for other purposes. Perhaps this hard line can be challenged to address the short term and then look at alternative capital for the long term?
I’m a big proponent of alternative capital, but I think Chip's right – it won’t solve today’s most pressing problem.
Alternative Capital protects the Share Insurance Fund and helps credit unions position themselves for growth opportunities. However, it isn’t a viable solution to help a credit union who has hit some black-ice and is moving into a danger zone. Unfortunately, for these credit unions the cost would be prohibitive or the market non-existent.
There seems to be a sweet spot for alternative capital: When you don’t need it today - but you plan to need it in the future. But it isn’t going to help those in need right now.
However, if we don’t get alternative capital now – we may never see it. There has never been a bigger stage and momentum for reform and legislative changes to get alternative capital passed today. So if we miss the window, I don’t know when we’ll ever get the chance.
I like your thinking ideas to use the NCUSIF to protect itself with short-term investments into credit unions in need. I think the days of NCUA using mergers at par as a solution to troubled credit unions is approaching an end. The accounting rules and more educated buyers will make this harder and harder for NCUA to find merger partners.
Let’s hope we get action on both strategies.
There are differenct types of struggling credit unions. Those with negative equity, and those with negative cash flows. A credit union with positive cash flow, or one that could be brought to a positive cash flow, could easily survive if this type measure were used, even with falling equity or liquidity. Such is the case with the Corporates. With some assistance for equity and liquidity, they will always be a good bet for positive cash flows. When a credit union, corporate or natural person, has negative cash flows, even with high net worth, it is only a matter of time.
If credit unions were only looked at as an investment, an ongoing business, we would have far fewer disappearing, and less costs for all of us to cover.
Which peer group services the highest nu...
Sophisticated Financial Tools Offer Big ...
NCUA Uses PIMCO to Implement New Account...
1001 Connecticut Ave. NW Suite 1001
Washington, DC 20036
P: 800-446-7453 F: 800-878-4712
© 2017 Callahan & Associates, Inc.
All rights reserved