Callahan Clients, please log in for direct access to:
Learn What You're Missing
Upgrade Your Subscription
Thank you for your interest in reading the fantastic content we have on CreditUnions.com! However, the page you are trying to access is for subscribers-only. To learn more, select an option below.
All users must now log in to read, research, browse, and have fun on CreditUnions.com. Yes, we still offer freebies. And, yes, it’s worth the extra effort.
Print or PDF this article today because you won't have access to it later. Or, click here to learn how to get 24/7 access.
Goals and the Overall Capability of the Data Processing Vendor
are developed in three major strategic pieces (Data, Business Logic,
and Presentation) and then married to a Network plan that provides
an overall solution for the credit union. Historically, the three
major strategic pieces have been presented as one overall component,
but today's credit union buyer must pay attention to the plans for
each piece of their solution and how it fits with their overall
goals and plans to implement.
Current (or Next) Data Processing Vendor
Sit down with your management team and ask a few questions. What
is the contractual responsibility of your current data processor
in aiding your transition to your new data processor? What data
files and data content are under contract to be converted? What
is the price for de-conversion? What will be lost? What will need
to be rebuilt?
fail, credit unions continue to sign new data processing contracts
with the expectations of never going through another conversion
ever again. This unfounded optimism is based on the sheer fear of
data processing conversions and an arrogance that the diligence
done in selecting this provider will result in the solution of all
solutions. De-conversions are the black hole of the entire process.
Without knowing what to expect from your old processor, how can
you judge the quality of your conversion and what to expect from
your new processor? In your Technology Strategic Plan, you hopefully
set a strategic goal to be known as an organization that can manage
change. The first goal to managing anything is understanding the
only be entered into if they guarantee that the content of your
database is one hundred percent owned by the credit union. Imagine
buying a paper-based filing system, only to find out when you buy
a new file cabinet that you only get to keep half the sheets of
paper from the old one.
is an Investment . . . Plan for an Investment-Based Return
When choosing a data processing vendor, soliciting a reference for
a new vendor, or planning for a conversion, it is common to hear
comments such as, ''My credit union is with ABC vendor, and
they're the best of a bad lot'' . . . ''Conversions may
be a necessary evil, but only once in a career'' . . . ''It's
not what I want, but it's the best I can do.''
For a very long
time, most credit union professionals would tell you that dealing
with technology vendors is a frustrating and out-of-control process.
Many professionals today believe that only the largest data processing
firms will survive based on the fact that R&D dollars and DP
overhead is just too overwhelming. For all the negative talk, it
is surprising there are not more efforts being made to actually
change the process from the inside out.
article, the concept that the core data processor is but a single
component of an overall technology plan has been repeated again
and again. It seems apparent that credit unions must try to find
a way to have more of a voice in the overall orchestration of these
partners if they are to increase their comfort zone with the entire
process. Data processing at its best is simply the electronic execution
of intellectual processes dictated by doing business. In the case
of the credit union business, credit union leaders need more leadership
in the actual vendor firms with which they do business, having a
voice in the intellectual processes and software.
a data processing vendor, the credit union's Technology Strategic
Plan needs to outline the goals it expects as far as an invested
return with each vendor. Credit unions should no longer settle for
being part of an advisory group, included in ''quality circle''
studies, or just trusting that what is good for the vendor is good
for the marketplace. Credit union leaders need to set higher goals
for participation in these firms, ultimately looking for equity
positions that give them greater insight into managing member services
a Power User
else is said and done, no credit union should make an investment
in a core data processing solution without openly stating their
intention to be craftsmen in utilizing this very important tool.
Egyptians built pyramids without power tools; renaissance artists
created masterpieces without computerized graphic design tools,
and credit unions should understand it is more the implementation
of a tool that leads to member satisfaction than the tool itself.
Goals and plans
for staff education, vendor interaction, and a true ownership of
the concepts that drive a tool will make the difference. No longer
can credit unions rely on budgets just to purchase; they must focus
on the budget and the effort necessary to implement and maintain.
Flip the coin.
Does your data processing vendor set the same goals for you as a
user? What are the vendor's education programs? What are the goals
for determining whether the tool is strong or weak? What procedures
are used to correct flaws and recognize opportunities? It all comes
down to business, not tools. Your data processing vendor needs to
be an extension of your staff, committed to execution, not just
Maybe the number
one challenge to selecting a data processing vendor for a complex
technical credit union is understanding the window of opportunity.
Managing vendor contracts, windows for conversions, and overlapping
accounting issues needs to be a constant process.
In the end it's
not about technology at all. Competitive advantages gained through
technology are fleeting. By the time you implement the newest technology,
your competition has copied, modified, or maybe even improved on
your process. But selecting business partners to help meet your
goals, develop your tactics, and effectively focus on your execution,
can mean the difference between success and failure. Bottom line,
the magic in technology often lends itself best to gadgets, but
your credit union needs a plan, a focus that says the member comes
first and all your partners understand your direction.
Randy Karnes is the CEO of WESCO. WESCO is a credit union-owned
CUSO and an independent data processor and management solutions
firm. WESCO was named 2000 Operational Services CUSO of the Year
by NACUSO and is a strong advocate of credit union ownership of
alternative service and financial organizations. For more information,
Randy Karnes, CEO
(800) 327-3478 ext 101
This sponsored content article is provided to the credit union community for shared insights and knowledge from a recognized solutions provider in the industry. Please note that the views and opinions offered here do not reflect those of Callahan & Associates, and Callahan does not endorse vendors or the solutions they offer.
If you are interested in contributing an article on CreditUnions.com, please contact our Callahan Media team at email@example.com or 1-800-446-7453.
November 5, 2001
7/26/2012 04:04 PM
This guy wouldn't know credit union ownership, much less operational goals, if he met them in an amusement park wax museum!!BEEN THERE, DONE THAT!!! Karnes portrayed what was then and possibly is still, a credit union " Wannabee" without actual experience of accountability to the membership and the resulting responsibility.
Submit your email address to receive daily industry updates and web-only features.
P: (800) 446-7453 | F: (800) 878-4712
1001 Connecticut Ave. NW Suite 1001
Washington, DC 20036