December 21, 2011
By Chip Filson
December 21, 2011 is the winter solstice — the longest, darkest night of the year. Going forward, we know the seasons will change and more light will shine with each day. But when will the regulatory darkness disappear? At the end of this month, it will be two years since the last audited financial statements for the Temporary Corporate Credit Union Stabilization Fund, managed by NCUA, were made available.
This single audit, released in July 2010, showed the contingent liability for the TCCUSF as of December 2009 for all corporate exposure was $6.6 billion.
Twenty-four months have passed from the date of these statements. Since that time three more corporates have been nationalized and, along with WesCorp Credit Union and US Central, stripped of their most valuable assets. NCUA has issued more than $28 billion in guaranteed notes to fund new collateralized securities which were sold to Wall Street. At that time, and still today, credit unions have record amounts of liquidity and demonstrated the ability to fund these assets.
Even after the seizures of these corporates, credit unions remain liable for all losses from these events even though they no longer receive the benefit of the yields now going to the new owners of the securities.
The seizure of three more corporates, the issuance of the guaranteed notes, the direct sale of more than $10 billion in assets held by WesCorp and US Central — activities totaling more than $50 billion — have been done completely in the dark. No income statements, balance sheets, cash flows, or any accounting for the tens of millions in operating expenses have been issued.
For example, NCUA paid $10 million just to broker assets transferred from corporates. NCUA has converted the corporate workout into a regulatory financial black hole — with no facts, data, or independent accounting available to anyone.
If this unreported activity had been engaged in by any firm, governmental agency, not-for-profit, or credit union, the board would have been removed and outside audits started immediately.
Not only has this financial darkness spread over credit union land, but one year ago the shadow was extended over Congress. NCUA, in a last-minute, pre-adjournment quick strike, got Congress to pass S4036, which was explained as merely housekeeping for the TCCUSF, so it did not meet any consultation, public discussion, or explanation.
And so it passed, all in the dark. Barely eight months later this legislation was cited as the authority for NCUA’s $2.0 billion dollar premium assessment as TCCUSF future expenses with no accounting for present or past expenses.
Congress, credit unions, and the public continue to be subject to arbitrary NCUA actions supported by neither fact nor logic.
Is this because the financial information, previously routinely provided monthly by corporates, is not available? Does NCUA not have the systems or capability of managing the assets taken? Or is it that the data doesn’t support the conservatorship estimates? Were losses presented as future facts three years ago found to be inaccurate, imprecise, or overreaction?
If the losses were overestimated, are these misjudgments being covered up? What is the current value of the five investment portfolios that were seized?
Some of the players in this darkening drama include:
PWC: Where is this firm two years after its audit was used to assess the contingent liability for the TCUGLP? Has it left the playing field? Is it accountable for this estimate today?
Congress: Where are the committees (Senate Banking and House Financial Services) that passed legislation without discussion in December 2010 now that $50 billion of credit union assets have been seized and disposed with no accounting?
GAO: Where is the government’s watchdog when the problem is occurring now?
OIG: Who does the inspector general represent — the NCUA board? The Congress? Credit unions? The administration? The taxpaying member? How can NCUA’s supervisory committee be missing in action when the greatest transaction of all is happening on its watch — but unwatched, unreported, and un-reviewed?
NCUA Board: How can board members who preach financial literacy, director accountability, and strict compliance be so blind to the consequences of not tracking, reporting, or even overseeing this massive transfer of assets? Is there no backtesting required of decisions? Where does the buck stop? Or does it?
NCUA Staff: How can professionals schooled, trained, and responsible for the financial integrity, reporting, and oversight of credit unions lose their own standards of conduct when managing credit union resources?
Credit unions and their voices: Members’ funds have been taken without any accounting — more funds are predicted to be assessed in the future. Is this acceptable oversight of the collective funds each credit union provides?
The choices going forward are clear. If the system allows public conduct to go unchecked and unaccounted for, then system redesign with new checks and balances are needed. If the system’s architecture is sound, then new leadership to correct the operational deficiencies are required. This is what NCUA board appointments should be about, but is the administration even tracking these issues?
If no one is watching after $50 billion is seized, what will be the next catastrophe that goes unexplained and unaccounted for?
The only way to overcome NCUA’s financial darkness is to shed light. As Senator Everett Dirkson once remarked on civil rights legislation, “When I feel the heat, I see the light.” Who will be a source of light in 2012?
7/26/2012 04:10 PM
Where is the accountability and transparency, while we have negative income and struggling?
Brian Fogg, Credit Union of Vermont
Mr. Filson, thank you for your valuable insights. I would add another party to your list of those that is responsible for action. Ou state and national trade associations. Where is their voice in pressing NCUA to respond to the legitimate questions you raise?
We need accountability!!Where is the money going?
Where is the transparency?
Michael Sacher, CPA
Chip-you continue to raise thoughtful questions that deserve a response. These issues, combined with questionable expertise at the examination level, raise serious questions about NCUA leadership. If these issues were identified by NCUA at one of their supervised CU's, the outcome would be much different. Big voids exist in Governance and Accountibility.
NCUA lacks transparency because it is hiding something. People don’t conceal good news. Therefore, NCUA is hiding bad news. The investment losses are likely greater than estimated – not less as suggested in the article. Otherwise, NCUA would be boasting about its magical turnaround powers. Credit unions should brace themselves for bigger assessments than credit union apologists are estimating. The old $50 billion is likely closer in value to $30 billion or less. Furthermore, the retail credit union exposure is also understated. The industry is reliving the S&L crises – only worse. Bankrupt retail credit unions are chasing yield just like the Corporate CUs did. When rates start to increase, in an 11th hour deal with Congress, NCUSIF will be conserved by FDIC. It will not be able to survive the Dollar administration’s unleashing of Corporate CU competition and NCUA cheerleading for business lending and loan particpations. Get ready. Do not kid yourselves with the industry’s and NCUA’s self-serving sugar coating.
Thank you for opening this discussion. We all need to turn up the heat and get some answers. NCUA has judgements against Deutsche Bank, Citi and at least one other----where is that money? NCUA claims their increased budget is due to adding more staff, so why can't they have their own audit completed after 2 years?
Thanks, Chip. Let's start turning the heat up on the NCUA to be transparent and revelatory as they demand we all be. We all know they've been turning it up on us, and continue to do so, since the economy nose-dived. We can only hope our Boards of Directors hear the clarion calls as well, and that the NCUA wises up to their business, if not ethical, obligations to our industry.
Chip, your comments are right on point. If any credit union was managed the way this has been the NCUA would have forced a change in both the management and board of directors, or would have closed the credit union. Keep up the good fight.
Thanks Chip for saying out loud what so many of our movement's leaders are unwilling say. Where is Chairwoman Matz and her commitment to transparrency now? Has the NCUA, and in particular the NCUA Board, finally realized that they are not good at actually running a creidt union that they so easily are critical of? I would also like a better accounting of how the NCUA believes they have saved millions of dollars for creidt unions by making such large increasses in thier exam force? They had pleanty of corporate examiners in the past and they were unable to adequately regulate/supervise them. Again Chip, thanks for speaking out as you always do ... let's hope that 2012 and beyond will bring about a better regulator in NCUA than in it has been in the past 8 years.
Same old government as usual!
Unfortunately, you, Chip, seem to be the only one raising these issues. The duplicity is astounding in what the regulators expect from us but can't complete for their own organization. I am wondering what my league dues are doing since I haven't heard anything from them to defend credit unions from this unchecked agency.
We are fortunate to have a former NCUA insider independent enough to address conditions that should not exist in such an important agency. NCUA is important to America's middle class and the institutions that serve it best. Thanks for not only being there, but for a desire to make things right.
Russ Dalke, Red Rocks Credit Union
I know Credit Union CFO’s throughout the country have certainly noticed and complained about the lack of transparency for at least the last two years. Perhaps the complaining has only been amongst us CFO’s and CEO’s. As a collective voice, I would like to see CUNA continue to keep the pressure on NCUA for full and open disclosure. I realize they have lots of irons in the fire, but certainly the protection of Credit Union assets (Corporate or NPCU’s) should always remain at the top of the list. Thanks for keeping this issue on the table.
WOW, would any other agency get away with something like this. Makes one certainly wonder, exactly who does NCUA report to. It appears, NOBODY is the answer!
This article again shows that government entities, federal, state or local have agenda unto themselves. It requires vigilance from all interested parties to keep the system on the high road.
Excellent article that exposes the NCUA and its governments blatant lack of transparency. I bet that it goes higher up to the WH administration since it ties in to the mega stimulus packages that also have little accountability and transparency.Chip thank you for sticking your neck out to wake the Credit unions everywhere including the trade associations in particular who have been silent as well.
Do not wait for CUNA or NAFCU to go down this road or “keep up the pressure” for transparency. Their interests are aligned with NCUA. Any effort would be cosmetic. Your hopes and money are wasted on waiting for CUNA, NAFCU, or any trade to act.
Hear what we will be featuring on CreditUnions.com this week.
Submit your email address to receive daily industry updates and web-only features.
P: 800-446-7453 | F: 800-878-4712
1001 Connecticut Ave. NW Suite 1001
Washington, DC 20036